4.1 Methode und editorische Standards
Barabucci, G. / Fischer, F. (2017): The Formalization of Textual Criticism: Bridging the Gap between Automated Collation and Edited Critical Texts. In: Boot, P. / Cappellotto, A. / Dillen, W. / Fischer, F. / Kelly, A. / Mertgens, A. / Sichani, A.-M. / Spadini, E. / Hulle, D. van (Hg.): Advances in Digital Scholarly Editing. Leiden: Sidestones Press, S. 47-54.
Dué, C. / Ebbott, M. (2009): Digital Criticism: Editorial Standards for the Homer Multitext. In: Digital Humanities Quarterly 3: 1. (http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/003/1/000029/000029.html).
Ebbott, M. (2010): Error 404: Theban epic not found. In: Trends in Classics 2, S. 239–258.
Munson, M. (2017): Biblical semantics: applying digital methods for semantic information extraction to current problems in New Testament studies. Aachen: Shaker. (= Theologische Studien)
Nunn, C. (2016): References in the correspondence of Augustine: chances and boundaries of digital “Distant Reading” processes. In: Revue d’Études Augustiniennes et Patristiques 62, S. 223–233.
4.2 Kritischer Apparat
Asokarajan, B. / Etemadpour, R. / Huskey, S. J. / Abbas, J. M. / Weaver, C. (2016): Visualization of Latin Textual Variants using a Pixel-Based Text Analysis Tool. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Visual Analytics. Geneva, Switzerland: The Eurographics Association.
Boschetti, F. (2007): Methods to extend Greek and Latin corpora with variants and conjectures: Mapping critical apparatuses onto reference text. In: Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference 2007.
Fischer, F. (2019): Digital Classical Philology and the Critical Apparatus. In: Berti, M. (Hg.): Digital Classical Philology. Ancient Greek and Latin in the Digital Revolution. Berlin: De Gruyter, S. 203-220. (= Age of Access? Grundfragen der Informationsgesellschaft 10)
Keeline, T. (2016): The apparatus criticus in the digital age. In: The Classical Journal 112, S. 342–363.
Shejuti, S. / Etemadpour, R. / Huskey, S. J. / Abbas, J. M. / Weaver, C. (2016): Visualizing Variation in Classical Text with Force Directed Storylines. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities. Baltimore, MD: IEEE.
4.3 Fragmente und Zitate
Almas, B. / Berti, M. (2013): Perseids Collaborative Platform for Annotating Text Re-Uses of Fragmentary Authors. In: DH-Case 2013. Collaborative Annotations in Shared Environments: Metadata, Vocabularies and Techniques in the Digital Humanities. Florence, September 10, 2013. ACM Publication. (DOI: 10.1145/2517978.2517986.)
Berti, M. / Romanello, M. / Babeu, A. / Crane, G. (2009): Collecting Fragmentary Authors in a Digital Library. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Joint International Conference on Digital Libraries. Austin TX / New York, S. 259–262.
Berti, M. (2012): Citazioni e dinamiche testuali. L’intertestualità e la storiografia greca frammentaria. In: Costa, V. (Hg.): Tradizione e Trasmissione degli Storici Greci Frammentari II. Atti del Terzo Workshop Internazionale, Roma, 24–26 febbraio 2011. Tivoli (Roma), S. 439–458.
Berti, M. (2013): Collecting Quotations by Topic: Degrees of Preservation and Transtextual Relations among Genres. In: Ancient Society 43, 269–288.
Berti, M. / Almas, B. / Dubin, D. / Franzini, G. / Stoyanova, S. / Crane, G. (2015): The Linked Fragment: TEI and the Encoding of Text Reuses of Lost Authors. Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative 8.
Berti, M. / Almas, B. / Crane, G.R. (2016): The Leipzig Open Fragmentary Texts Series (LOFTS). In: Bernstein, N. W. / Coffee, N. (Hg.): Digital Methods and Classical Studies. DHQ Themed Issue 10: 2. (http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/10/2/000245/000245.html).
Berti, M. (2018): Annotating Text Reuse within the Context: The Leipzig Open Fragmentary Texts Series (LOFTS). In: Tischer, U. / Gärtner, U. / Forst, A. (Hg.): Text, Kontext, Kontextualisierung. Moderne Kontextkonzepte und antike Literatur. Hildesheim / Zürich / New York: Olms, S. 223-234.
Berti, M. (2019): Digital Fragmenta Historicorum Graecorum (DFHG). In: Digital Humanities 2019. Book of Abstracts. Utrecht, July 8-12, 2019.
Berti, M. (2019): Historical Fragmentary Texts in the Digital Age. In: Berti, M. (Hg.): Digital Classical Philology. Ancient Greek and Latin in the Digital Revolution. Berlin: De Gruyter, S. 257-276. (= Age of Access? Grundfragen der Informationsgesellschaft 10)
Martin, T. R. / Berti, M. (2017): Open Greek and Latin Data for the Challenges of the Fragmentary State of the Primary Sources for the Pentekontaetia. Mouseion 14.3, 409-436.
Romanello, M. / Berti, M. / Boschetti, F. / Babeu, A. / Crane, G. (2009): Rethinking Critical Editions of Fragmentary Texts by Ontologies. In: Mornati, S. (Hg.): Rethinking Electronic Publishing: Innovation in Communication Paradigms and Technologies. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Electronic Publishing held in Milano, Italy 10–12 June 2009, Milano, S. 155–174.
Romanello, M. (2011): The Digital Critical Edition of Fragments: Theoretical Problems and Technical Solution. In: Cotticelli Kurras, P. (Hg.), Linguistica e Filologia Digitale: Aspetti e Progetti, Alessandria, S. 147–155.
Straßburger, K. (2018): Digital Fabius Pictor. In: Digital Classics Online 4.2, S. 21-36.
Trachsel, A. (2017): Presenting Fragments as Quotations or Quotations as Fragments. In: Digital Classics Online 3.2, S. 17-27.
Trachsel, A. (2012): Collecting Fragments Today: What Status Will a Fragment Have in the Era of Digital Philology? In: Clivaz, C. / Meizoz, J. / Vallotton, F. / Verheyden, J. (Hg.): Lire demain – Reading tomorrow, Lausanne, S. 415–429.
4.4 Linked Open Data
Almas, B. / Babeu, A. / Krohn, A. (2014): LOD in the Perseus Digital Library. ISAW Papers 7: Current Practice in Linked Open Data for the Ancient World. New York, NY: Institute for the Study of the Ancient World. (http://dlib.nyu.edu/awdl/isaw/isaw-papers/7/almas-babeu-krohn/).
Berti, M. / Almas, B. / Dubin, D. / Franzini, G. / Stoyanova, S. / Crane, G. (2015): The Linked Fragment: TEI and the Encoding of Text Reuses of Lost Authors. Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative 8.
Cayless, H. A. (2019): Sustaining Linked Ancient World Data. In: Berti, M. (Hg.): Digital Classical Philology. Ancient Greek and Latin in the Digital Revolution. Berlin: De Gruyter, S. 35-50. (= Age of Access? Grundfragen der Informationsgesellschaft 10)
Elliott, T. / Heath, S. / Muccigrosso, J. (Hg.) (2014): Current Practice in Linked Open Data for the Ancient World. ISAW Papers 7. (http://doi.org/2333.1/gxd256w7)
Ogbuji, U. / Baker, M. (2015): Data Transforms, Patterns and Profiles for 21st century Cultural Heritage. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Cultural Heritage Markup. Balisage Series on Markup Technologies. Mulberry Technologies, Inc. Volume 16. (https://doi.org/10.4242/BalisageVol16.Ogbuji01).
Romanello, M. / Pasin, M. (2017): Using Linked Open Data to Bootstrap a Knowledge Base of Classical Texts. In: Second Workshop on Humanities in the Semantic Web (WhiSe II) co-located with 16th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2017). CEUR, 3-14.
Roueché, C. / Lawrence, K. / Lawrence, K. F. (2014): Linked Data and Ancient Wisdom. ISAW Papers, 7.25.
4.6 Technische Umsetzung (u. a. Textauszeichnung)
Bodard, G. (2010): Epigraphic Documents in XML for Publication and Interchange. In: Feraudi-Gruénais, F. (Hg.): Latin on Stone: Epigraphic research and electronic archives. Lanham: Lexington Books, 1-17.
Boschetti, F. (2007): Marcatura XML applicata a repertori di congetture sui “Persiani” di Eschilo. In: Citti, F. / Del Vecchio, T. (Hg.): Papers on grammar. 9, 3. From manuscript to digital text: problems of interpretation and markup. Proceedings of the colloquium (Bologna, june 12th 2003). Roma: Herder, S. 1–10.
Burns, P. J. (2018): Constructing Stoplists for Historical Languages. In: Digital Classics Online 4.2, S. 4-20.
Citti, F. / Del Vecchio, T. (Hg.) (2007): Papers on grammar. 9, 3. From manuscript to digital text: problems of interpretation and markup. Proceedings of the colloquium (Bologna, june 12th 2003). Roma: Herder.
Milanese, G. (2007): XML e lo studio dei manoscritti: linee di orientamento e un esempio di applicazione. In: Citti, F. / Del Vecchio, T. (Hg.): Papers on grammar. 9, 3. From manuscript to digital text: problems of interpretation and markup. Proceedings of the colloquium (Bologna, june 12th 2003). Roma: Herder, S. 71–91.
Steiner, K. / Mahony, S. (2016): How are digital methods changing research in the study of the classical world ? An EpiDoc case study [¿ Cómo los métodos digitales están cambiando la investigación del mundo clásico ? El caso del EpiDoc]. In: Panta Rei: Revista Digital de Ciencia y Didáctica de la Historia, S. 125–148.
Tauber, J. K. (2019): Character Encoding of Classical Languages. In: Berti, M. (Hg.): Digital Classical Philology. Ancient Greek and Latin in the Digital Revolution. Berlin: De Gruyter, S. 137-158. (= Age of Access? Grundfragen der Informationsgesellschaft 10)
Tomasi, F. (2007): XML / TEI per la trascrizione delle fonti primarie e la codifica dell’apparato critico. In: Citti, F. / Del Vecchio, T. (Hg.): Papers on grammar. 9, 3. From manuscript to digital text: problems of interpretation and markup. Proceedings of the colloquium (Bologna, june 12th 2003). Roma: Herder, S. 129–148.
Tupman, C. (2010): Contextual epigraphy and XML: digital publication and its application to the study of inscribed funerary monuments. In: Bodard, G. / Mahony, S. (Hg.): Digital research in the study of classical antiquity. Farnham: Ashgate, S. 73–86. (= Digital research in the arts and humanities)
4.7 Open Access
Schubert, C. (2016): In eigener Sache: Open Access, Editorial in: Digital Classics Online 2.3.
Privacy Imprint